The High Price Of Brain Plasticity

The costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity are thought to have important ecological and evolutionary consequences, but they are not as well understood as the benefits of plasticity. There are at least nine ideas regarding how plasticity may be costly or limited, but these are rarely discussed together. The most commonly discussed cost is that of maintaining the sensory and regulatory machinery needed for plasticity, which may require energy and material expenses.

The cost of maintaining the sensory and regulatory machinery needed for plasticity

The most commonly discussed cost of plasticity is the energy and material expenses required to maintain the sensory and regulatory machinery needed for plasticity. This machinery allows organisms to respond to environmental changes and develop new traits to survive. However, the environmental cues guiding plastic development can sometimes be unreliable, which may limit the benefits of plasticity.

There are at least nine ideas regarding how plasticity may be costly or limited, but these have rarely been discussed together. It is challenging to quantify the costs of plasticity without controlled quantitative genetic experimental designs. Related groups of individuals are typically raised in different environments to estimate the components of phenotypic variation due to genetic affiliation, environment, and genotype-environment interactions.

While the costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity are thought to have important ecological and evolutionary consequences, they are not as well understood as the benefits of plasticity. Experimental studies have not detected widespread costs, and some argue that relaxed selection and variable selection intensities are more important constraints to the evolution of plasticity than the costs of plasticity.

The expectation that plasticity is necessarily costly

The costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity are thought to have important ecological and evolutionary consequences, yet they are not as well understood as the benefits of plasticity. There are at least nine ideas about how plasticity may be costly or limited, but these are rarely discussed together. The most commonly discussed cost is that of maintaining the sensory and regulatory machinery needed for plasticity, which may require energy and material expenses.

Phenotypic plasticity is generally regarded as a key mechanism for enabling organisms to survive in the face of environmental change. However, because no organism is infinitely or ideally plastic, there must be limits to the evolution of phenotypic plasticity, or plasticity may have inherent significant costs. While numerous experimental studies have not detected widespread costs, other studies advocate for the view that relaxed selection and variable selection intensities are likely more important constraints to the evolution of plasticity than the costs of plasticity.

The expectation that costly but nonadaptive plasticity should persist in nature

The most commonly discussed cost of phenotypic plasticity is that of maintaining the sensory and regulatory machinery needed for plasticity, which may require energy and material expenses. However, numerous experimental studies have not detected widespread costs. Instead, it is suggested that relaxed selection and variable selection intensities are likely more important constraints to the evolution of plasticity than the costs of plasticity.

The costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity are thought to have important ecological and evolutionary consequences, yet they are not as well understood as the benefits of plasticity. At least nine ideas exist regarding how plasticity may be costly or limited, but these have rarely been discussed together. A frequently considered limit to the benefit of plasticity is that the environmental cues guiding plastic development can be unreliable.

The expectation that plasticity will remain costly over evolutionary time

Phenotypic plasticity is generally regarded as a key mechanism for enabling organisms to survive in the face of environmental change. However, there are limits to the evolution of phenotypic plasticity, and plasticity may have inherent significant costs. The most commonly discussed cost is that of maintaining the sensory and regulatory machinery needed for plasticity, which may require energy and material expenses.

The costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity are thought to have important ecological and evolutionary consequences, yet they are not as well understood as the benefits of plasticity. At least nine ideas exist regarding how plasticity may be costly or limited, but these have rarely been discussed together. A frequently considered limit to the benefit of plasticity is that the environmental cues guiding plastic development can be unreliable.

Numerous experimental studies have not detected widespread costs of phenotypic plasticity. It has been suggested that relaxed selection and variable selection intensities are likely more important constraints to the evolution of plasticity than the costs of plasticity.

The limits of phenotypic plasticity

The most commonly discussed cost is that of maintaining the sensory and regulatory machinery needed for plasticity, which may require energy and material expenses. A frequently considered limit to the benefit of plasticity is that the environmental cues guiding plastic development can be unreliable.

Phenotypic plasticity is generally regarded as a key mechanism for enabling organisms to survive in the face of environmental change. However, because no organism is infinitely or ideally plastic, there must be limits to the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. For example, an organism may lack the ability to produce an optimal trait.

The parameters needed to detect the costs of plasticity require controlled quantitative genetic experimental designs. Related groups of individuals are raised in two or more environments to estimate components of phenotypic variation due to genetic affiliation, environment, and genotype-environment interactions.

Frequently asked questions