California's Plastic Ban: Revenue And Environmental Impact

California has been at the forefront of the movement to ban single-use plastic bags, with the state passing a law in 2014 to reduce plastic waste and limit emissions. However, the ban has not been without its challenges. While the law initially allowed grocers to sell thicker plastic bags for a small fee, these bags often ended up as waste, defeating the purpose of the ban. California's latest effort to address this issue is a new law that aims to raise $5 billion from industry members to tackle plastic pollution in the most affected communities. This comes as reports show an increase in plastic bag waste per capita since the initial ban.

The plastic bag ban in California has not reduced plastic waste

California's plastic bag ban has not reduced plastic waste. In fact, the tonnage of discarded bags rose from 4.08 per 1,000 people in 2014 to 5.89 per 1,000 people in 2021, a record high. The actual tonnage of plastic waste increased by almost 50%. This is because the newer bags, which cost 10 cents, are thicker to meet technical specifications for "reusable", but typically are not reused.

The state's ban on thin single-use bags had a loophole that let grocers sell shoppers thicker plastic bags for a small fee. In theory, the heavier bags were reusable. But in practice, they became a more substantial form of waste. "A plastic bag has an average lifespan of 12 minutes and then it is discarded, afflicting our environment with toxic microplastics that fester in our oceans and landfills for up to 1,000 years," said Sen. Catherine Blakespear, an author of the new ban.

The plastic bag ordinance in Mountain View, California, which also included a minimum 10-cent fee on paper bags, resulted in a 67% decline in the proportion of customers using a paper bag. However, the ban has not reduced plastic waste overall.

Municipal systems are unable to recycle plastic bags and the soft material causes equipment jamming at recycling centres, leading to dangerous and costly repairs that account for 150 hours of lost staff time and $300,000 in city costs. In contrast, restrictions like bag bans "can be expected to eliminate almost 300 single-use plastic bags per person per year, on average," according to an analysis by Environment America and the U.S. PIRG Education Fund.

The ban has created a new form of waste

California's ban on thin single-use bags had a loophole that allowed grocers to sell thicker plastic bags for a small fee of 10 cents. These bags were supposed to be reusable, but in practice, they became a more substantial form of waste. The thicker bags are not being reused, and the actual tonnage of plastic waste has increased by almost 50%. The ban has also resulted in a 67% decline in the proportion of customers using paper bags.

The new law also creates a fund that will raise $5 billion from industry members to be used by the state to address plastic pollution in the most impacted communities.

The ban has not reduced the number of plastic bags used

California's plastic bag ban has not reduced the number of plastic bags used. The ban, which was passed in 2014, was intended to reduce the amount of discarded plastic and limit emissions resulting from their production. However, a report by the consumer advocacy group CALPIRG found that the tonnage of discarded bags rose from 4.08 per 1,000 people in 2014 to 5.89 per 1,000 people in 2021, a record high. The actual tonnage of plastic waste increased by almost 50%. This is because the new bags, which typically cost 10 cents, are thicker to meet technical specifications for "reusable" but are typically not reused.

The ban had a loophole that allowed grocers to sell shoppers thicker plastic bags for a small fee. In theory, these heavier bags were reusable. But in practice, they became a more substantial form of waste. Sen. Catherine Blakespear, an author of the new ban, said, "A plastic bag has an average lifespan of 12 minutes and then it is discarded, afflicting our environment with toxic microplastics that fester in our oceans and landfills for up to 1,000 years."

California's plastic bag ban is not unique in its ineffectiveness. In 2020, Oregon's statewide ban added a paper bag fee, which resulted in a 157% increase in the proportion of customers using at least one paper bag. In contrast, Vermont's plastic bag ban, which includes a minimum 10-cent fee on paper bags, resulted in an estimated 3.6% increase in paper bag use.

To address plastic pollution, California has passed a law that creates a fund that will raise $5 billion from industry members to be used by the state to address plastic pollution in the most impacted communities.

The ban has not reduced the amount of plastic waste

California's plastic bag ban has not reduced the amount of plastic waste. The ban, which was passed in 2014, was intended to reduce the amount of discarded plastic and limit emissions resulting from their production. However, a report by the consumer advocacy group CALPIRG found that the tonnage of discarded bags rose from 4.08 per 1,000 people in 2014 to 5.89 per 1,000 people in 2021, a record high. The actual tonnage of plastic waste increased by almost 50%. This is because the new bags, which cost 10 cents, are thicker to meet technical specifications for "reusable" but are typically not reused.

The ban had a loophole that allowed grocers to sell shoppers thicker plastic bags for a small fee. In theory, the heavier bags were reusable. But in practice, they became a more substantial form of waste. Sen. Catherine Blakespear, an author of the new ban, said in a news release: "A plastic bag has an average lifespan of 12 minutes and then it is discarded, afflicting our environment with toxic microplastics that fester in our oceans and landfills for up to 1,000 years."

The new law also creates a fund that will raise $5 billion from industry members to be used by the state to address plastic pollution in the most impacted communities. However, it is unclear how much of this money has been raised so far.

The ban has not increased the use of paper bags

The plastic bag ban in California has not increased the use of paper bags. In fact, the ban has had the opposite effect. The ban on thin single-use bags had a loophole that allowed grocers to sell thicker plastic bags for a small fee of 10 cents. These bags are supposed to be reusable, but in practice, they are often not. A report by CALPIRG found that the tonnage of discarded bags increased by almost 50% between 2014 and 2021.

The Mountain View plastic bag ordinance, which included a minimum 10-cent fee on paper bags, resulted in a 67% decline in the proportion of customers using paper bags. This is in contrast to Philadelphia, which had no paper bag fee as part of its single-use plastic bag ordinance and saw a 157% increase in the proportion of customers using at least one paper bag after its ban.

The California plastic bag ban has not been effective in reducing plastic waste. The thicker plastic bags that replaced the thin single-use bags are more substantial waste. They have a longer lifespan than thin bags, but they are still typically discarded after a few uses. This has resulted in an increase in the total tonnage of plastic waste.

The ban on thin single-use plastic bags in California has not increased the use of paper bags. The fee on paper bags has discouraged their use, and the thicker plastic bags that replaced thin single-use bags are still being discarded, contributing to plastic waste.

Frequently asked questions