Tuna And Plastic: What's The Harmful Connection?

Plastic pollution is a pressing issue, with microplastics—plastic particles smaller than 5mm—finding their way into our oceans and, subsequently, our food. Canned tuna, a common food product, has been found to contain microplastics, with one study showing that 80% of samples had at least one plastic particle. The presence of microplastics in our food raises concerns about potential health risks, especially with regular consumption. While the long-term effects are still being studied, it is clear that plastic pollution is a significant issue that needs addressing.

Microplastics in canned tuna

Microplastics are plastic particles smaller than 5mm long, about the width of a standard drinking straw. These particles are sometimes intentionally created this small, but they often come from larger plastic objects breaking down, such as clothing, plastic bottles, and car parts. As these objects break down due to washing, wear and tear, or being discarded, microplastics are released into the environment, where they can be ingested by animals and make their way up the food chain into human bodies.

Canned tuna has been found to contain microplastics, with studies detecting these particles in the edible tissue of various canned fish products. One study found that all 32 samples of canned tuna from Ecuadorian markets contained microplastics, with an average of 692 ± 120 MPs/100 g of tuna in water and 442 ± 84 MPs/100 g of tuna in oil. Another study found that 90% of the reported particles were between 1 and 50 µm in size, with the most common types being PET, polystyrene, and nylon. These microplastics likely come from the ingredients and inputs of the canning process.

The presence of microplastics in canned tuna raises concerns about potential health risks for humans who consume these products. While the long-term effects are still being studied, it is known that microplastics can contain potentially harmful chemicals, which could be passed on to those ingesting them. Additionally, the presence of microplastics in the ocean and other waterways is a significant environmental concern, as it affects marine life and ecosystems.

While it is challenging to avoid microplastics entirely, individuals can take steps to reduce their consumption of products that frequently shed microplastics, such as choosing cotton clothing and bedding, using non-plastic reusable water bottles, and recycling plastic to prevent its degradation in landfills. These actions can help raise awareness about the issue and lead to global policy changes to protect the environment and human health.

Potential health risks of consuming plastic-contaminated tuna

Tuna is a migratory fish that can concentrate large amounts of various pollutants, including microplastics and heavy metals. Microplastics are plastic particles smaller than 5mm long, which can be created intentionally or come from larger plastic objects that have degraded. These microplastics can enter the environment through air, water, and soil, and can work their way up the food chain into human bodies. While the health effects of microplastics are not yet fully understood, their presence in canned tuna and other seafood products raises concerns about potential risks to human health.

Microplastics have been detected in various foodstuffs and beverages, including canned tuna, with potential toxic elements such as aluminium and other heavy metals. The accumulation of these contaminants in seafood products puts food safety and availability at risk. A study on canned fish from Taif markets in Saudi Arabia found different types of microplastics in edible tuna tissue, including nylon, 1,2-polybutadiene, and ethylene vinyl alcohol.

The potential health risks of consuming plastic-contaminated tuna are not yet fully understood, but there are concerns about the impact of microplastics on human health. While the human body is unlikely to absorb plastics, the potential risk lies in the chemicals associated with the plastics and the accumulation of these chemicals in the body. These chemicals can include toxic substances such as heavy metals, which can have harmful effects, especially on vulnerable groups such as children, pregnant women, and those trying to conceive.

It is challenging to avoid consuming microplastics entirely, as they are pervasive in the environment. However, individuals can take steps to reduce their exposure by limiting their consumption of products that frequently shed microplastics, such as choosing cotton clothing and bedding, using non-plastic reusable water bottles, and recycling plastic to prevent degradation in landfills. These small changes can contribute to a larger movement to protect human health and the environment from the potential risks of microplastic pollution.

Sources of plastic contamination in canned tuna

Microplastics are plastic particles smaller than 5mm long, about the width of a standard drinking straw. These particles are sometimes created this small intentionally, but they often come from larger plastic objects such as clothing, plastic bottles, car parts, and other synthetic materials. As these objects break down due to washing, wear and tear, or disposal, microplastics are released into the air, water, and soil. These microplastics can then make their way into animals via respiration or ingestion, and can potentially work their way up the food chain into human bodies.

Canned tuna, in particular, is the most common canned fish in US markets. A study by Bushehr University of Medical Studies analyzed 50 cans of fish across seven brands and three different fish species to determine the presence of microplastics. The results showed that not every can contained microplastics, but those that did contained more than one particle, ranging from 5-22 microplastics per can. Another study of canned tuna available in Ecuadorian markets found a significant presence of microplastics, with 692 ± 120 MPs/100 g of tuna in water and 442 ± 84 MPs/100 g of tuna in oil.

The sources of plastic contamination in canned tuna can be traced back to the ingredients and inputs of the canning process, as well as the accumulation of plastic particles in the ocean and other waterways. Tuna is a migratory fish that can concentrate large amounts of various pollutants, including microplastics and heavy metals. The higher salt content of the can also contributes to the presence of microplastics, as salt is believed to be a major contributor.

To reduce the potential health risks associated with microplastic consumption, it is recommended to include micro-, meso-, and even nanoplastics in guidelines for testing food safety management systems. Additionally, consumers can take steps to reduce their exposure to microplastics by choosing all-cotton clothing and bedding, using non-plastic reusable water bottles, and recycling plastic whenever possible.

The impact of plastic on the environment

Plastic pollution is a pressing issue that has captured the attention of many worldwide. From large pieces of plastic to microplastics, these pollutants are infiltrating our environment and our food systems, with potentially harmful consequences. Microplastics, defined as plastic particles smaller than 5mm, are of particular concern as they can easily enter the food chain and ultimately end up in our bodies.

The presence of microplastics in canned tuna is a stark example of how plastic pollution is impacting our environment and our health. Canned tuna is a popular seafood product, especially in markets in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), and it has been found to be contaminated with microplastics. Studies have detected different types of microplastics in canned tuna, including nylon, 1,2-polybutadiene, and ethylene vinyl alcohol. These microplastics likely originate from various sources such as synthetic clothing and blankets, plastic water bottles, food packaging, and fisheries equipment. The higher salt content in canned tuna also seems to contribute to the presence of more microplastics.

To address the impact of plastic on the environment, it is essential to reduce plastic consumption and properly manage waste. This includes choosing reusable and eco-friendly alternatives, recycling plastic, and supporting policies that protect the environment and human health. By taking these steps, we can work towards mitigating the presence of plastics and microplastics in our ecosystems and food sources.

While the presence of microplastics in canned tuna is concerning, it is important to note that plastic pollution affects a variety of seafood products and other food sources. Therefore, a comprehensive approach to addressing plastic pollution and its environmental impact is necessary to safeguard our ecosystems and our health.

How to reduce plastic consumption

Plastic pollution is a pressing issue, with microplastics—plastic particles smaller than 5mm—finding their way into our oceans and, subsequently, our food chain. A TikTok video brought this issue to light when the creator examined the contents of a can of tuna and found what they believed to be plastic. This discovery is not an isolated incident, as researchers have found microplastics in various canned fish products, including tuna. While it is challenging to avoid all contact with microplastics, there are ways to reduce our plastic consumption and minimize the presence of these particles in our food.

One way to reduce plastic consumption is to limit the use of single-use plastic items. Single-use plastics are designed to be used once and then discarded, contributing significantly to plastic waste. Instead of single-use plastic bags, opt for reusable bags when shopping. Similarly, instead of using plastic straws, choose reusable metal, glass, or paper straws. When it comes to food storage, invest in reusable containers made from glass or stainless steel rather than relying on plastic bags or containers. These simple swaps can significantly reduce the amount of plastic waste generated.

Another way to reduce plastic consumption is to avoid products packaged in plastic. Many food items, such as fruits, vegetables, and grains, are often packaged in plastic wrapping or containers. Try to buy these items loose or in bulk whenever possible, bringing your own reusable bags or containers for storage. For example, instead of buying pre-packaged apples in a plastic bag, bring a reusable bag to the grocery store and select loose apples to put in it. This approach reduces the amount of plastic packaging waste generated.

In addition to reducing plastic consumption, it is important to properly dispose of and recycle plastic waste. Check with your local waste management guidelines to understand what types of plastic can be recycled and how to prepare them for recycling. Properly disposing of plastic waste helps prevent it from ending up in our oceans and breaking down into microplastics. It is also worth noting that microplastics are not just limited to the oceans; they can also come from indoor dust and be inhaled or ingested. So, while reducing plastic consumption is crucial, it is equally important to advocate for policy changes that address plastic pollution and protect the environment and human health.

Frequently asked questions