Plastic In Fish: What's The Real Damage?

how much plastic is inside fish

Plastic pollution is a pressing environmental issue, with an estimated 40-80% of marine waste consisting of plastic. This waste is ingested by marine life, including fish, and has been found to contaminate seafood consumed by humans. The presence of microplastics, plastic particles smaller than 5mm, in fish has been observed in various studies, with one finding plastic in 75% of the fish examined. The impact of ingesting plastic-contaminated fish on human health is not yet fully understood, but it is a growing concern as plastic waste continues to increase in our oceans.

Characteristics Values
Percentage of marine litter that is plastic 40-80%
Increase in plastic production since the 1950s From 1.5 million tons to 367 million tons
Amount of secondary microplastics emitted annually 68,500-275,000 tons
Percentage of secondary microplastics in the 5 trillion floating on the sea Over 90%
Percentage of world production of fishery products used for human consumption 88%
Number of plastic particles in a 300-gram serving of flathead, grouper, shrimp, scad, or barracuda Hundreds
Number of plastic particles in a 2-ounce child’s serving of flathead, grouper, shrimp, scad, or barracuda Dozens
Percentage of fillets with at least one microplastic present 74%
Percentage of livers with at least one microplastic present 63%
Percentage of fish with at least one particle present in any of the three studied tissues 99%
Percentage of commercially fished species that ingested plastic 75%
Number of plastic particles in one in five contaminated samples of 20 brands of canned sardines and sprats from 13 countries over four continents 1/5

shunpoly

Plastic pollution in the ocean

The presence of plastic in the ocean has devastating consequences for marine life and ecosystems. Marine animals such as sea turtles, seabirds, seals, and other marine mammals are killed by ingesting plastic or becoming entangled in it. Research indicates that half of the world's sea turtles have ingested plastic, and it is estimated that over 1 million marine animals die each year due to plastic pollution. Plastic debris can cause suffocation, internal injuries, and infections in marine animals, and it is estimated that 17% of the species affected by plastic pollution are on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species.

Furthermore, plastic pollution in the ocean has direct implications for human health. Seafood, including wild-caught fish such as oysters and tuna, often contains microplastics. These microplastics can end up in the gastrointestinal tract of humans who consume seafood, potentially causing oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, and translocation to other tissues. Microplastics can also release harmful chemical substances and act as carriers of microorganisms. While the specific risks to human health are still being studied, the presence of microplastics in seafood highlights the extent to which plastic pollution has permeated the marine environment and entered the food chain.

Addressing ocean plastic pollution requires urgent action from individuals, corporations, and governments. While recycling efforts are important, only about 10% of the plastic produced is currently being recycled, with the rest being incinerated or ending up in the environment. To curb the plastic pollution crisis, a combination of policy changes, improved waste management, and a shift towards more sustainable alternatives is necessary.

shunpoly

Microplastics in seafood

Plastic waste has become a significant environmental problem, with an estimated 381 million metric tonnes produced annually, and this figure is expected to double in the next ten years. The marine environment is particularly affected, with an estimated 40-80% of marine litter consisting of plastic. As a result, microplastics have been found in seafood, with studies detecting microplastics in 99% of seafood samples, including fish and shellfish.

Microplastics are plastic particles smaller than 5mm in length, and they are formed when larger plastics degrade due to exposure to natural forces like sunlight and waves. These tiny plastic particles contaminate the marine ecosystem and the food chain, ending up in seafood intended for human consumption. The ingestion of contaminated seafood is a significant route of human exposure to microplastics, with potential health risks.

Studies have found microplastics in various types of seafood, including wild-caught fish such as oysters, tuna, and lingcod, as well as shrimp and pink shrimp. The levels of microplastics can vary depending on the species and size of the fish, with larger fish containing a higher number of microplastics overall, but smaller fish having more microplastics per gram of tissue. Additionally, processed seafood may have higher levels of microplastics, as seen in the case of store-bought shrimp compared to shrimp obtained from a fishing boat.

The presence of microplastics in seafood poses potential risks to human health. Once ingested, microplastics can reach the gastrointestinal tract and be absorbed, causing oxidative stress and cytotoxicity. They can also release harmful chemical substances, including organic and inorganic compounds, as well as act as carriers of microorganisms. While the full extent of the risks is not yet fully understood, the widespread contamination of seafood highlights the urgent need to address plastic pollution and reduce plastic use.

shunpoly

Health risks of consuming plastic-contaminated fish

Plastic waste has become a significant environmental problem, with an estimated 40-80% of marine litter made up of plastic. This waste is often in the form of microplastics, which are plastic particles less than 5mm in length. These microplastics are ingested by fish and other seafood, which can then be passed on to humans when consumed. While the health risks of consuming plastic-contaminated fish are not yet fully understood, there are several concerns regarding the potential impact on human health.

Firstly, microplastics can reach the gastrointestinal tract and cause oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, and translocate to other tissues. Oxidative stress is a risk factor for cancer. Microplastics can also release chemical substances, both organic and inorganic, that they have absorbed from their surroundings or that are present in their matrix. These chemicals, such as polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE), bisphenol A (BPA), nonylphenol (NP), and octylphenol (OP), can be harmful to humans.

Secondly, microplastics may act as carriers of microorganisms and contribute to the spread of harmful bacteria or viruses. The accumulation of microplastics in the bodies of fish and other marine organisms can also result in physical harm, such as intestinal blockages or the obstruction of gills, leading to respiratory issues.

Additionally, the consumption of plastic-contaminated fish may result in the indirect ingestion of toxic chemicals associated with plastic manufacturing. These chemicals, such as PBDEs and BPA, can be released from plastic products and enter the marine environment, where they are ingested by marine life and accumulated in their tissues. This bioaccumulation means that larger fish and those higher up the food chain tend to have higher levels of toxins, which are then passed on to humans when consumed.

While the specific health risks associated with consuming plastic-contaminated fish are still being studied, the presence of microplastics in seafood is a significant concern. The potential impact on human health, along with the environmental consequences of plastic pollution, highlights the importance of addressing this issue and finding ways to reduce plastic waste and its impact on our oceans and marine life.

Plastic BBs: Weighing the Differences

You may want to see also

shunpoly

Plastic ingestion by commercially fished species

Plastic ingestion by marine fish is widespread and increasing. Plastic debris is one of the numerous anthropogenic stressors that imperil marine life. It has been found that 386 marine fish species have ingested plastic debris, including 210 species of commercial importance. The incidence rate of plastic ingested by fish was 26%, and this has doubled over the last decade, increasing by 2.4% per year. This is due to improved detection methodologies and an increase in fish consuming plastic.

A study of eight commercially exploited fish species from different marine habitats off the coast of Brazil found that all species had ingested plastic. The highest frequency of plastic ingestion was observed in the pelagic skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis (25.8%), and the lowest was the demersal bluewing searobin Prionotus punctatus (5%). Microplastics predominated in all species, and fibers/lines and fragments were the main items found, possibly derived from fishing materials.

Another study of fish purchased from seafood markets across 4000 km of Australia found that an average of 35.5% of fish samples had at least one piece of microplastic in their gastrointestinal tract. South Australia had the highest percentage of fish with plastic (49%), and Tasmania the lowest (20%). The average microplastic load was 0.94 pieces per fish, but some fish had up to 17 pieces.

The ingestion of microplastics by commercially fished species is a significant issue due to the potential risks to human health. Microplastics can reach the gastrointestinal tract and be absorbed, causing oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, and translocation to other tissues. They can also release chemical substances that are harmful to humans.

shunpoly

Sources of microplastics in the marine environment

Plastic waste has become a significant environmental problem, with an estimated 40-80% of marine litter made up of plastic. The production of plastic is closely linked to the growth of the human population, which is projected to exceed 9 billion by 2050. As a result, the demand for plastic, fishery, and aquaculture products will only increase.

Marine microplastic pollution can be divided into inland, sea-based, and air-based sources. The primary source of microplastics in the marine environment is plastic waste from land-based sources, such as households, rivers, and fishing waste, which continuously enter the oceans. In 2010, an estimated 4.8 to 12.7 million metric tons of plastic waste from 192 coastal countries entered the ocean. This waste undergoes degradation and fragmentation, leading to the formation of hazardous secondary microplastics, which are estimated to constitute more than 90% of the 5 trillion microplastics floating in the sea.

Another significant source of microplastics in the marine environment is the discharge of pre-production plastic pellets by plastic producers directly into waters, often with little to no repercussions due to de-regulation. These small plastic pellets, along with larger plastic debris, fragment into microplastics over time.

The presence of microplastics in the marine environment poses a risk to marine life, including fish. Studies have found microplastics in the fillets and livers of various fish species, indicating that plastics are not just excreted but also travel to other parts of the body, including those consumed by humans. The ingestion of microplastics by marine life can have various health impacts, such as oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, and the release of harmful chemical substances.

To address the issue of microplastics in the marine environment, strategies such as source control, remediation, cleanup efforts, regional involvement, and research are crucial. International agreements and regulations, such as those proposed by the European Union and the United Nations, are essential to curb plastic production and consumption, encourage recycling, and implement circular economy systems.

Frequently asked questions

Microplastics are tiny pieces of plastic that float in the air, contaminate the food we eat and the water we drink. They are any plastic particles that are less than 5mm in length.

It is inevitable that seafood will contain microplastics. A study found that 74% of fillets and 63% of livers had at least one microplastic present, while 99% of fish had at least one particle present in any of the three studied tissues. Another study found plastic particles in about one in five samples of canned sardines and sprats.

While larger fish contain a higher number of microplastics overall, smaller fish contain more microplastics per gram of tissue. The smallest fish studied were found to have up to 900 plastic particles in their guts.

The health risks of eating plastic-contaminated fish are not yet fully understood. However, microplastics can release chemical substances and additives such as BPA, which may cause endocrine disruption, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment