The Arctic's Plastic Pollution Crisis: A Comprehensive Overview

The Arctic is one of the most pristine places on Earth, but it is facing an increasing threat from plastic pollution. Plastic debris and microplastics are ubiquitous in the Arctic, with studies finding higher concentrations of microplastics in sea ice than in the infamous ocean garbage patches. The Arctic Ocean surface waters hold the most plastics of any ocean basin, and the number of particles measured in some parts of the Arctic ocean bottom are the highest in the world. This plastic pollution has severe consequences for the region's wildlife, public health, safety, and socioeconomic well-being. The sources of this pollution are varied, with ocean currents, wind, and rivers transporting plastic debris and microplastics from the North Atlantic, North Pacific, and rivers to the Arctic. The impact of this pollution is long-lasting, as plastics never completely disappear, and the broken-down microplastics continue to accumulate in the environment, finding their way into the food chain.

Nanoplastics have been found in both polar regions, likely carried by wind and ocean currents

Plastic pollution has been found in the most remote corners of the planet, from the top of Mount Everest to the Arctic ice. Scientists have now discovered microscopic evidence of plastic in the form of nanoplastics at both the North and South Poles. Nanoplastics are fragments of plastic smaller than a micrometre, formed when larger plastics break down through physical, chemical, or biological processes. Due to their lightweight nature, they can be easily carried long distances by wind and ocean currents, reaching even the most uninhabited regions of the planet.

The presence of nanoplastics in the polar regions is a significant concern as it indicates the widespread nature of plastic pollution. Studies have found higher concentrations of microplastics in sea ice in the Arctic than in the infamous ocean garbage patches. The Arctic Ocean, surrounded mostly by land, receives water from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, large rivers, precipitation, and meltwater from glaciers. This interconnectedness allows microplastics from more populated areas to reach the Arctic through ocean currents.

Air currents also play a crucial role in transporting nanoplastics to the polar regions. Airborne microplastics have been found falling on the far north, mixed with snow. The lightweight nature of nanoplastics makes them susceptible to being carried by wind over long distances, contributing to their presence in remote polar regions. The impact of inhaling and ingesting nanoplastics on human and animal health is an area of ongoing research, but it is known to be toxic to both marine organisms and humans.

The Arctic, despite its low population density and limited shipping traffic, faces significant plastic pollution due to the influx of plastics from southern regions. Coastal currents, such as the coastal stream along the Norwegian coast and the Greenland and Barents Seas, act as a conveyor belt for plastic pollution. The amount of deep-ocean plastic on the seabed between Svalbard and Greenland has increased significantly, and high concentrations of microplastics have been found in surface waters near Novaya Zemlya and the west side of Svalbard and Greenland.

The presence of nanoplastics in the polar regions underscores the urgent need to address the growing global problem of plastic pollution. With almost 400 million tonnes of plastics produced annually, the issue of nanoplastics is not going away. As plastics continue to break down into smaller pieces, the challenge of mitigating their spread becomes more complex. While efforts are being made to reduce and recover plastic waste, the pervasive nature of nanoplastics highlights the importance of continued research and action to address this pressing environmental concern.

The Arctic has some of the greatest loads of plastic on the planet, with 63% of the ice-free Arctic Ocean slightly polluted

Plastic pollution is a pressing issue that affects all ecosystems, including marine environments. The Arctic, specifically, is one of the most plastic-polluted regions on Earth, with 63% of its ice-free areas being slightly contaminated. This is due to a variety of factors, including the region's proximity to highly industrialised areas, the impact of natural factors like wind and currents, and the challenges of effectively managing plastic waste in such a remote and harsh environment.

The Arctic's plastic pollution is a significant concern due to its fragile ecosystem and the region's critical role in regulating global climate patterns. The pollution originates from a variety of sources, including land runoff, shipping activities, and discarded fishing gear. The impact of plastic pollution in the Arctic is exacerbated by natural factors such as solar radiation, wind, and currents, which contribute to the breakdown of plastic into microplastic and nanoplastic particles. These smaller particles can be ingested by marine life, leading to health issues and even death.

Microplastics, smaller than 5 mm, are shed from products like synthetic textiles and tyres through abrasion. Even smaller nanoplastics, smaller than 100 nm, can pass through cell membranes and enter living organisms. The ingestion of these plastics by marine life in the Arctic has severe consequences for the region's biodiversity and ecosystem health. The impact of plastic pollution in the Arctic is long-lasting due to the non-biodegradable nature of plastic, which means it can persist in the environment for hundreds of years.

Addressing plastic pollution in the Arctic requires a comprehensive approach. This includes improving waste management practices, particularly in poorer countries, and reducing the production of single-use plastics. Additionally, the implementation of global treaties and strong national plans is necessary to curb plastic pollution effectively. Proper waste management strategies, such as recycling, incineration, and sealed landfills, are crucial to preventing plastic from entering the environment and the oceans.

The Arctic's severe plastic pollution highlights the urgent need for systemic transformation to address the plastic crisis. This includes transitioning to a circular economy, reducing plastic production, phasing out harmful products, and adopting rigorous reporting and compliance mechanisms. By tackling plastic pollution in the Arctic and other regions, we can help mitigate the environmental, social, and economic impacts of this global issue.

Plastic debris in the Arctic comes from distant sources, including busy shipping lanes between North America and Europe

The Arctic is facing a significant plastic pollution problem, with plastic debris and microplastics ubiquitous in the region. This pollution poses a severe threat to the already vulnerable Arctic ecosystems, which are experiencing the impacts of climate change, with the Arctic warming at four times the global average rate.

The plastic debris in the Arctic originates from a variety of sources, both local and distant. Locally, plastic debris comes from ships and Arctic communities with inadequate waste management systems. However, it is important to note that remote sources also contribute significantly to the problem.

One notable distant source of plastic pollution in the Arctic is the busy shipping lanes between North America and Europe. The convergence of plastic pollution from the East Coast of the United States and northwestern Europe in the Atlantic Ocean creates a "conveyor belt" of garbage that gets swept up in the ocean currents. This plastic debris eventually finds its way to the Greenland Sea and Barents Sea, which act as "dead ends" for this plastic conveyor belt.

In addition to the shipping lanes, plastic debris in the Arctic has been traced to various other distant sources. For example, a citizen science project conducted by the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) found that one-third of the plastic debris analysed, which still bore imprints or labels, came from Europe, with a large proportion originating from Germany. The study also revealed that plastic pollution in the Arctic comes from as far away as Brazil, China, and the United States, with debris found on the coast of Svalbard.

The accumulation of plastic pollution in the Arctic is a pressing issue, and it is evident that distant sources, including busy shipping lanes between North America and Europe, play a significant role in this problem. To effectively address this issue, it is crucial to improve waste management practices, particularly on ships and in fisheries, and to reduce global plastic production, especially in industrialised countries.

Microplastics are mixed throughout the water column and are heading towards Antarctica

Microplastics are a major global concern, and their presence is widespread. They are found in all the world's oceans and seas, and their impact on the environment is harmful. While there is limited data on the Southern Hemisphere, and Antarctica in particular, microplastics have been found in Antarctic waters and snow.

The Southern Ocean was previously thought to be relatively free of microplastic contamination. However, recent studies have shown microplastics in deep-sea sediments and surface waters. The presence of microplastics in Antarctic waters is likely due to a combination of local and external sources. Local sources include scientific research stations and ships, which may contribute significantly on a local scale. It is important to note that wastewater treatment facilities are not mandatory at research stations in Antarctica, which could contribute to the release of microplastics into the environment.

External sources of microplastics in Antarctica are likely to be significant. The identification of microplastics in Antarctic snow suggests the potential for long-range transportation of these particles. Backward air mass trajectories indicate potential transportation of up to 6000 km. This suggests that microplastics can travel great distances and reach even the most remote regions of the planet.

The presence of microplastics in Antarctica is a concern due to the sensitivity of its ecosystem. The continent is characterized by limited internal pollution sources, but high-burden external routes of contaminants. The impact of microplastics on the Antarctic environment, particularly in remote areas such as the Weddell Sea, is an area of ongoing research. The complex and multisectoral nature of microplastic pollution highlights the need for standardized monitoring and further research to understand their distribution and impact on this unique ecosystem.

The effects of plastic pollution on polar ecosystems and human health are still being understood

Plastic pollution is a pressing issue in polar ecosystems, threatening the health of both the environment and humans. The Arctic, in particular, has become pervasively polluted by plastics, even in areas with no apparent human activity, such as the deep seafloor. This pollution comes from a variety of sources, including local fisheries, landfills, wastewater, and industrial activity, as well as distant regions, with plastics carried to the Arctic by ocean currents, atmospheric transport, and rivers.

The impact of this pollution is evident across various levels of the Arctic food web. Zooplankton, marine invertebrates like sea anemones and starfish, and fish such as sculpin and Atlantic cod have all been found to ingest microplastics. Given the importance of fish as indicators of ecosystem health and their inclusion in the human diet, the presence of plastics in these species warrants further investigation into the potential risks for humans. Mammals, seabirds, and invertebrates have also been observed to interact with plastic debris, with some species listed as vulnerable or near-threatened, indicating a heightened risk from plastic pollution.

The effects of plastic pollution on human health are wide-ranging and concerning. Humans are exposed to toxic chemicals and microplastics through inhalation, ingestion, and skin contact at various stages of the plastic lifecycle. While research in this area is still evolving, existing scientific findings indicate that plastic pollution contributes to diseases, disabilities, and premature deaths. Specifically, the toxic chemical additives in plastics have been linked to causing cancer and endocrine disruption, resulting in reproductive, growth, and cognitive impairments. These health impacts disproportionately affect vulnerable groups, including children, women, and marginalized communities, exacerbating concerns about environmental injustice.

Furthermore, the economic and social costs associated with plastic pollution are substantial but often externalized by the petrochemical and plastic manufacturing industries. Citizens, taxpayers, and governments bear the burden of these costs without compensation. The exponential increase in global plastic production, coupled with low recovery and recycling rates, exacerbates the problem. As a result, plastic waste persists in the environment, contaminating aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric environments and degrading vital ecosystems.

Frequently asked questions