Plastic's Landfill Footprint: How Much Space Does It Occupy?

Plastic waste is a pressing global issue, with mass production of plastics accelerating so rapidly that it has created 8.3 billion metric tons, most of which ends up as trash. While recycling is an option, it is not a very effective one, with a Greenpeace report finding that almost none of the plastic put into recycling bins is actually recycled. As a result, landfills are a common method for dealing with plastic waste, with the world's plastic requiring a city-sized piece of land for storage. This raises concerns about the environmental impact of plastic waste, including the formation and spread of microplastics and the release of harmful volatile organic compounds.

Plastic waste in landfills can lead to the formation and spread of microplastics

Plastic waste is a significant global issue, with the world producing 9.5 billion tonnes of plastic to date. While recycling is an option, it is not always effective, and a large proportion of plastic waste ends up in landfills. In 2018, landfills in the US received 27 million tons of plastic waste, and it is estimated that landfills store 21-42% of worldwide plastic waste. This plastic waste takes up a substantial amount of space, with estimates suggesting that storing the world's plastic waste underground would require land the size of a large city.

The accumulation of plastic waste in landfills has serious environmental implications, particularly regarding the formation and spread of microplastics (MPs). Landfills create the ideal conditions for plastic biodegradation by microbial communities, leading to the breakdown of plastics into smaller particles. These microplastics, with a size ranging from 1 mm to 5 mm in diameter, are then released into the environment through landfill leachate and gases.

Landfill leachate, formed when water percolates through waste deposits, contains high concentrations of microplastics. It has been identified as a significant reservoir of microplastics, with the potential to release them into the surrounding environment through air and water. The release of microplastics from landfill leachate can have undesirable effects on both humans and the ecosystem.

Furthermore, the degradation of plastic waste in landfills can result in the release of toxic substances. As plastic debris ages, it undergoes oxidative photodegradation, leading to the release of harmful volatile organic compounds. These compounds can have adverse environmental and health impacts, contributing to pollution and posing risks to nearby communities.

The spread of microplastics from landfills is a critical environmental concern. While primary sources of microplastics include cosmetic, cleansing, and personal care products, secondary sources, such as the degradation of plastic waste in landfills, play a significant role in their proliferation. The formation and release of microplastics from landfills highlight the need for improved waste management practices, including effective recycling solutions and alternative approaches to plastic usage and disposal.

Plastic pollution in the environment is a serious risk

The problem of plastic pollution is not just about the space it takes up in landfills but also the environmental impact it has when it ends up in waterways and oceans. Recycling efforts have been largely ineffective, with reports finding that almost none of the plastic put into recycling bins is actually being recycled. This is due in part to greenwashing by companies and the challenges of recycling certain types of plastics. As a result, plastic waste is accumulating in landfills and sloughing off into the natural environment as litter, with an estimated 8 million metric tons of plastic entering oceans every year.

The presence of plastic in the environment poses a serious risk to wildlife and ecosystems. Plastic takes more than 400 years to degrade, and during this time, it can break down into microplastics that contaminate natural ecosystems. These microplastics contain chemical additives such as bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers, which are endocrine disruptors and can have harmful effects on animals and the environment. The release of toxic substances from plastic degradation further contributes to the risk of plastic pollution in the environment.

To address the serious risk of plastic pollution, a comprehensive, global approach is needed. This includes rethinking plastic chemistry, product design, recycling strategies, and consumer use. Efforts to ban single-use plastics and implement "bottle bills" that pay customers to return plastic bottles have been proposed, but they face steep resistance from plastic and oil industry lobbyists. Additionally, the mass production of plastic must be curbed, as the rapid increase in production has overwhelmed global waste systems, leading to leakage into oceans and other natural environments.

In conclusion, plastic pollution in the environment is a critical issue that requires immediate attention and action. The accumulation of plastic waste in landfills and natural environments, the challenges of recycling, and the release of toxic substances during degradation all contribute to the serious risk posed by plastic pollution. Addressing this risk will require a concerted effort from governments, industries, and consumers to reduce plastic production, improve recycling strategies, and prevent the release of plastic waste into the environment.

The world has produced 9.5 billion tonnes of plastic

The world has produced a staggering 9.5 billion tonnes of plastic to date. This figure underscores the sheer magnitude of plastic production and the urgent need to address the environmental challenges it poses.

Plastic has become an integral part of our daily lives, offering convenience, durability, and versatility. However, the consequences of our reliance on plastic are far-reaching. As of 2015, about 7 billion tons of plastic had been discarded as waste, with only a small fraction of it being recycled or incinerated. The vast majority, approximately 79%, ended up in landfills.

The sheer volume of plastic waste poses significant challenges when it comes to landfill space. To put it into perspective, the volume of space required to store 9.5 billion tons of plastic is 18.3 billion cubic meters. The area needed for this landfill depends on its thickness. For instance, if we were to create a landfill that is just one meter thick, it would cover an area of 18,000 square kilometers, which is equivalent to 1.5 New York Cities.

As the height of the landfill increases, the area it covers decreases. A 10-meter-thick landfill would cover an area of 1,800 square kilometers, roughly the size of London. If the landfill were 25 meters thick, it would occupy just over 700 square kilometers, similar in size to Baghdad. While these landfills may seem like a viable solution, it is important to consider the environmental implications and the need to find more sustainable alternatives.

The issue of plastic waste extends beyond landfill space. When plastic waste is not properly managed through recycling, incineration, or sealed landfills, it becomes an environmental pollutant. Rich countries produce the most plastic waste per person, but it is the mismanagement of waste in low-to-middle-income countries that contributes significantly to plastic pollution, particularly in the oceans. It is estimated that between 1 and 2 million tons of plastic enter the oceans annually, with most of it originating from middle-income countries across Asia.

Most plastic ends up in landfills, not recycled

Plastic is a rapidly growing component of municipal solid waste (MSW). Containers and packaging, which include bags, sacks, wraps, bottles, jars, and other containers, had the most plastic tonnage at over 14.5 million tons in 2018. This is in addition to the use of plastic in durable goods such as appliances, furniture, and casings of lead-acid batteries.

Despite the growing amount of plastic waste, only a small fraction of it is recycled. In the United States, for example, only 5-6% of the 40 million tons of plastic waste generated in 2021 was recycled, according to a report by environmental groups Beyond Plastics and The Last Beach Cleanup. The rest ended up in landfills (85%) or was incinerated (10%). Similarly, in 2018, the US recycled 3 million tons of plastic, resulting in an 8.7% recycling rate.

The low recycling rates are not unique to the US. According to a study published in the journal Science Advances, only 9% of the 8.3 billion metric tons of plastic ever produced has been recycled. The vast majority (79%) is accumulating in landfills or sloughing off in the natural environment as litter.

The problem is further exacerbated by the fact that even plastics that make it to recycling facilities are not always recycled. For example, 30-36% of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles are wasted during the recycling process. Additionally, there is the issue of plastic ending up in waterways due to improper recycling, which poses a significant threat to marine life.

The space required to store all the world's plastic in landfills is staggering. It would take a city-sized piece of land, equivalent to 1.5 New Yorks if the landfill is one metre thick, or the size of London if it is 10 metres thick.

The volume of landfill needed for plastic waste depends on its thickness

The volume of landfill needed for plastic waste is a significant concern, and it depends on several factors, primarily the thickness of the landfill site. The world has produced 9.5 billion tonnes of plastic so far, and this vast amount of plastic waste needs to be dealt with. If we were to send all this plastic to landfill, we would need 18.3 billion cubic metres of space.

The thickness of the landfill determines the area of land required. For instance, if we had a shallow landfill, just one metre thick, we would need an area of 18,000 square kilometres, which is the size of 1.5 New York Cities. However, if the landfill was 10 metres thick, the area needed would be reduced to 1,800 square kilometres, the size of London. A thicker landfill of 25 metres would require only 700 square kilometres, roughly the size of Baghdad.

The amount of space plastic takes up in landfills is a critical issue. While it may not require land on the scale of major countries, it would still need an area the size of a large city. This is a significant amount of space, and the problem is ongoing, with plastic production increasing. Greenpeace reports that most plastic ends up in landfills, and recycling rates are extremely low, with only 5% of plastic being successfully repurposed.

The environmental impact of plastic waste is severe, and while incineration is an option, it is not ideal due to the toxic emissions released. Plastic waste in landfills also contributes to the formation of microplastics, which have serious ecological consequences. Therefore, it is essential to consider the thickness of landfills to optimise space and minimise the environmental footprint.

Frequently asked questions