Plastic Pollution In Chesapeake Bay: A Grim Reality

Plastic pollution in the Chesapeake Bay is a pressing issue. The Bay is home to over 18 million people and 3,600 species of plants and animals, all of which are threatened by plastic pollution. Plastic bags are one of the most common forms of plastic pollution in the Bay, with five trillion bags used globally each year. These bags break down into microplastics, which have been found in almost every water sample taken in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Microplastics have also been detected in the stomachs of various marine animals in the Bay, including blue crabs and black sea bass. The concentration of microplastics increases near urban areas and after heavy rainfall, and they have been shown to accumulate in habitats such as shorelines and underwater grass beds. The impact of microplastics on the Bay's ecosystems and aquatic species is still being studied, but they are considered a contaminant of mounting concern.

Plastic pollution in the Chesapeake Bay is increasing

Plastic pollution is a pressing issue in the Chesapeake Bay, with microplastics posing a significant threat to the region's delicate ecosystem. The Bay, a vital estuary and home to a diverse array of marine life, is facing an increasing influx of plastic debris, endangering the health of both the environment and the local communities that depend on it.

The presence of microplastics, plastic particles smaller than five millimeters, has been confirmed in the Chesapeake Bay and its surrounding waterways. These tiny plastic pieces originate from the breakdown of larger plastic objects, such as water bottles, plastic bags, and construction debris, which accumulate in the Bay due to human activity and stormwater runoff. The sticky nature of microplastics allows them to attract and release chemicals, posing a toxic threat to marine life and the food chain that ultimately impacts human health.

Studies have detected microplastics in various samples from the Bay and its tributaries, with concentrations peaking near urban areas and after heavy rainfall. In one study, microplastics were found in 59 out of 60 samples of marine animals, and subsequent surveys found them in every sample collected. The University of Maryland's research also revealed that Eastern oysters, a Bay inhabitant, mistake microplastic beads for food, leading to increased stress and negative impacts on their health.

The Chesapeake Bay Program, a state-federal partnership, has identified microplastics as a contaminant of mounting concern. The issue has gained international attention, with researchers striving to understand the full scope of the problem and its ecological implications. The complex nature of microplastics, their ability to evade detection, and their accumulation in the Bay's habitats underscore the urgency of addressing this growing pollution crisis.

Efforts to combat plastic pollution in the Chesapeake Bay are underway, with Virginia implementing measures to reduce single-use plastics and polystyrene products. However, the problem persists, and the pandemic has introduced new challenges with the potential for personal protective equipment to contribute to microplastic pollution. As plastic pollution continues to increase globally and in the Bay, collaborative and innovative solutions are necessary to protect the fragile ecosystem and the diverse species that call it home.

Microplastics are found in marine animals and human food sources

Microplastics are a significant concern in the Chesapeake Bay region, impacting both marine animals and human food sources. The Bay is a vital ecosystem for a variety of species, and the presence of microplastics has raised concerns about their potential harm to the environment and human health.

Marine Animals and Microplastics in Chesapeake Bay

The Chesapeake Bay is home to a diverse range of aquatic species, including fish, oysters, and crabs. These animals play a crucial role in the ecosystem, but they are also vulnerable to the effects of microplastics. Studies have found that marine animals in the Bay frequently ingest microplastics, mistaking them for food. For example, Eastern oysters, a species unique to the Bay, have been observed consuming microplastic beads in laboratory settings. This is particularly concerning as oysters are a vital filter feeder, and their health directly impacts the overall ecosystem of the Bay.

A 2014 survey of four tidal tributaries to the Bay found microplastics in 59 out of 60 samples of various marine animals, including blue crabs. A separate study by the University of Delaware also found microfibers in 48% of crabs collected, primarily in their stomachs. These findings indicate that microplastics are being ingested by a wide range of marine animals in the Bay, which can have detrimental effects on their health and survival.

Human Food Sources and Microplastics in Chesapeake Bay

The presence of microplastics in the Chesapeake Bay also has implications for human food sources. Seafood, such as fish and crabs, can contain microplastics, which then enter the human food chain. A study by Dr. Susanne Brander of Oregon State University found microplastics in black seabass, a fish species commonly consumed by humans. As these fish feed on a variety of prey, they accumulate microplastics and the associated chemicals, which are then passed on to humans through consumption.

The issue of microplastics in human food sources extends beyond seafood. Microplastics have been detected in tap and bottled water, as well as in the air we breathe. It is estimated that humans may be ingesting a credit card's worth of microplastics every week. The health implications of this are still being understood, but the potential risks are significant, with microplastics found even in mothers' placentas.

The Chesapeake Bay region is taking steps to address the issue of microplastics, with researchers working to understand their impact on ecosystems and human health. These efforts include monitoring programs, reduction goals, and the development of alternatives to plastics, such as Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA). By addressing the problem at its source and limiting the release of microplastics, the region hopes to mitigate the potential harm caused by these tiny plastic particles.

Plastic waste in the Bay is caused by runoff from urban areas

Plastic waste in the Chesapeake Bay is a significant issue, with microplastics found in 98% of samples taken from the bay. These tiny plastic particles, often originating from the breakdown of larger plastic items, are consumed by aquatic species and have been shown to cause harm to the Bay region's ecosystems. The presence of microplastics in the bay is largely attributed to runoff from urban areas, which is a significant contributor to the overall pollution of the Chesapeake Bay.

Urban areas, with their dense populations and extensive impervious surfaces, generate substantial amounts of runoff during rainfall or snowmelt events. This runoff, known as stormwater, flows over paved surfaces, picking up various pollutants along the way, including plastic particles and microplastics. As the water rushes down streets, parking lots, and storm drains, it carries these pollutants into local rivers and streams, ultimately leading to their deposition in the Chesapeake Bay.

The impact of urban runoff on the bay is exacerbated by the rapid erosion of stream banks in urban areas. This erosion contributes large amounts of sediment pollution to the water, providing an additional pathway for microplastics to enter the aquatic environment. Furthermore, urban areas are often characterised by a lack of green spaces, wetlands, and parks, which could otherwise act as natural buffers and filters for floodwaters and pollutants.

The problem of plastic waste in the bay is not limited to the physical presence of microplastics. These tiny plastic particles have been found to attract and absorb chemicals, acting like slow-release capsules. As a result, they can introduce and spread harmful substances throughout the bay and its ecosystems. This chemical contamination further exacerbates the impact of plastic waste on the bay's health and the species that inhabit it.

To address the issue of plastic waste in the Chesapeake Bay caused by urban runoff, several measures can be implemented. These include improving wastewater treatment processes to better target microplastics, promoting the reduction of single-use plastics and non-biodegradable materials, and encouraging the adoption of more sustainable practices in urban areas. By combining upstream prevention efforts, such as focusing on urban areas and limiting the release of microplastics at their source, with effective management strategies, the impact of plastic waste on the bay can be mitigated.

Plastic pollution is a threat to wildlife in the Bay

Plastic pollution is a significant threat to wildlife in the Chesapeake Bay. The bay is a sink for plastic pollution, and the problem is only getting worse. Plastic in the bay comes from a variety of sources, including runoff and stormwater discharge from urban areas, as well as trash and debris that make their way into local waterways. The pandemic has also contributed to the problem, with masks being identified as a potential source of microplastics.

One of the most concerning aspects of plastic pollution in the bay is the presence of microplastics, which are plastic pieces smaller than five millimeters in size. These tiny plastic particles have been found in high concentrations in the bay, especially near urban areas and after heavy rains. They are consumed by a growing number of aquatic species, including oysters, crabs, and fish, and can have harmful effects on their health. For example, a study found that oysters that ate microplastics had significantly increased algal clearance rates, indicating stress and reduced nutrition.

The sticky nature of microplastics also means they can act as slow-release capsules for chemicals, picking up and releasing toxins as they move through the environment. This can have serious implications for the health of both wildlife and humans, as these chemicals can accumulate in the food chain. Black seabass, an ocean fish that frequents the southern portion of the bay and is consumed by humans, has been found to contain microplastics and the chemicals that leach out of them.

In addition to microplastics, larger plastic objects such as water bottles, plastic bags, and even construction hard hats have been found in the bay. These items can break down into smaller pieces, contributing to the microplastic problem. They can also directly harm wildlife, such as the sei whale that died in the Chesapeake Bay after ingesting a sharp shard of a plastic DVD case.

Efforts are being made to address the problem of plastic pollution in the bay, including a recent executive order in Virginia to reduce the use of single-use plastics and polystyrene objects. However, more needs to be done to protect the diverse wildlife that calls the bay home, including the five species of sea turtles that inhabit the bay, either seasonally or permanently, and the countless other creatures at risk from plastic pollution.

Efforts to reduce plastic pollution in the Bay

The Chesapeake Bay is a sink for plastic pollution, with microplastics being found in all samples taken at nontidal stations in the Chesapeake watershed. The presence of microplastics in the Bay has been linked to the consumption of plastic by aquatic species, including eastern oysters and blue crabs. Efforts to reduce plastic pollution in the Bay include:

Research and Studies

The Chesapeake Bay Program, a state-federal partnership leading the Bay restoration effort, identified microplastics as a contaminant of concern in 2018. Researchers from the University of Maryland and the Virginia Institute of Marine Science have also conducted studies to understand the extent and impact of microplastic pollution in the Bay. These studies provide important baseline data and help inform management decisions.

Policy and Legislation

Virginia Governor Ralph Northam issued an executive order to ban the use of plastic bags, straws, cutlery, and other single-use plastic items in state government facilities, including state universities. The order also includes a plan to phase out all non-medical single-use plastics and polystyrene objects by 2025. Additionally, Virginia approved a plan to restrict the use of polystyrene cups and food containers by food chains and other vendors. A local option to add a 5-cent tax on plastic bag use at grocery, convenience, and drug stores was also passed.

Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades

Upgrades to wastewater treatment plants have been identified as a necessary step in reducing plastic pollution. While plants have met their goals for reducing nutrient pollution, they were not designed to target microplastics specifically.

Public Education and Awareness

Educating the public about the impacts of plastic pollution and the importance of reducing, reusing, and recycling plastic products is crucial. Organizations such as the Bay Journal and Chesapeake Bay Magazine help spread awareness by publishing articles and studies on plastic pollution in the Bay.

Collaboration and Partnerships

The Bay restoration effort is a collaborative process involving state and federal partnerships, such as the Chesapeake Bay Program and the NOAA Marine Debris Program. These partnerships bring together experts and researchers from various organizations to address the complex issue of plastic pollution.

Frequently asked questions