Plastic In Our Food: What's The Real Cost?

Plastic is everywhere. From the Arctic snow to remote deserts, plastic has infiltrated almost every corner of the Earth. It's in our food, our drinks, and even the air we breathe. Research has found that 90% of animal and vegetable protein samples tested positive for microplastics, and a person may consume about 5 grams of microplastics in a week. These tiny polymer fragments, ranging from less than 0.2 inches to 1/25,000th of an inch, are now omnipresent in our food system. They come from various sources, including plastic packaging, tea bags, and even the clothes we wear. With plastic production increasing, the issue of plastic contamination in our food is only expected to worsen.

Plastic in bottled water

Plastic pollution is a growing concern, and it is now evident that microplastics and nanoplastics are present in our food and bottled water. A recent study found that a litre of bottled water may contain nearly a quarter of a million pieces of plastic, with 90% of these being nanoplastics.

Nanoplastics are plastic particles below one micrometer in length, and they are measured in billionths of a meter. These particles are so small that they can enter human cells and potentially damage DNA and disrupt the immune, reproductive, and nervous systems. The study, conducted by Columbia University and supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), used lasers to detect these previously invisible plastic particles.

The researchers developed a new SRS approach to detect micro- and nanoplastics at the single-particle level and then created an algorithm based on machine learning to identify seven common types of plastic. They found that the bottled water contained all seven types of plastic, with polyamide, a type of nylon used in water purification, being the most common. Other plastics identified included polyethylene terephthalate (PET), the material used to make water bottles, polyvinyl chloride, polymethyl methacrylate, and polystyrene.

The presence of these plastic particles in bottled water is concerning, as plastic is known to contain various additive chemicals, many of which are hazardous. These chemicals can leach into the water and be consumed, potentially impacting human health. While the full range of health effects is not yet fully understood, there is enough evidence to cause concern.

To reduce our exposure to plastic particles in bottled water, it is recommended to transition from single-use plastic bottles to reusable alternatives. Additionally, it is important to address the global crisis caused by the production of millions of tons of plastic each year, with a focus on reducing plastic waste and increasing recycling rates.

Microplastics in salt

Plastic pollution has become a global concern, with microplastics—small plastic particles under 5mm in size—found in various natural environments, including oceans, air, snow, and deserts. This issue extends to our food systems, with microplastics detected in commonly consumed products, such as bottled water, beer, tea, and rice.

Salt, an essential seasoning and preservative in our diets, has also been implicated in the microplastics crisis. Studies have found microplastics in various types of salt, including sea salt, kosher salt, and fleur de sel, sourced from different countries. The presence of microplastics in salt is concerning, given its widespread use and the potential health risks associated with consuming these particles.

Research has revealed that microplastics in salt originate from various sources, including the breakdown of larger plastic items, the release of microfibers from synthetic clothing, and the improper disposal of plastic waste. These particles can find their way into oceans and other water sources, eventually contaminating salt through the evaporation and crystallization processes used in salt production.

One study analyzed 39 brands of salt and found that only three were free of microplastics. Another study examined 17 salt brands from eight countries and detected microplastics in all but one brand. The most common types of plastic polymers found in salt include polypropylene and polyethylene, which are used in products like plastic bottles and packaging. While the concentration of microplastics in salt is generally low, estimated at around 0.01 particles per gram, the potential health implications are not fully understood.

The health risks associated with consuming microplastics in salt remain a subject of ongoing research. While some studies suggest potential harm to human health, others have found no conclusive evidence of adverse effects. However, it is important to note that microplastics have been shown to carry hazardous chemicals and microorganisms, and their small size allows them to pass through human intestines and lungs or enter the bloodstream and placental fluid. Given these concerns, individuals are advised to reduce their overall exposure to plastic and choose sustainably harvested sea salt to minimize their consumption of microplastics.

Plastic in tea bags

The problem with plastic in tea bags is twofold. Firstly, when tea bags containing plastic are steeped in hot water, they can release billions of micro- and nanoplastic particles, which are then ingested by the drinker. A study by researchers from the Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain found that tea bags made from nylon-6, polypropylene, and cellulose released varying amounts of plastic particles when brewed. For example, polypropylene released approximately 1.2 billion particles per millilitre, while nylon-6 released 8.18 million particles per millilitre. These plastic particles may be small enough to enter human cells, and the potential health risks of consuming these particles are still not fully understood. While the health effects of ingesting microplastics are still being studied, there are concerns about potential endocrine disruption, reproductive toxicity, cancer risk, problems with metabolism and nutrition, and interference with neurodevelopment.

Secondly, the disposal of tea bags containing plastic contributes to the plastic problem and environmental pollution. Tea bags that contain plastic should not be composted, as they will break down into microplastics, introducing chemicals back into the food chain as plants absorb them from the soil. Instead, these tea bags should be put in the trash. However, even when disposed of properly, plastic tea bags can take hundreds of years to decompose naturally.

To avoid consuming microplastics from tea bags, individuals can opt for loose-leaf tea, which can be brewed using a stainless steel tea infuser or a cloth-based tea bag. Some tea brands also offer plastic-free tea bags, and it is worth checking the packaging or contacting the company to inquire about the use of plastic in their products. Additionally, individuals can purchase tea in bulk and use a metal strainer to separate the tea leaves from the hot water.

Plastic in meat packaging

Plastic packaging is a major contributor to global plastic waste. Meat is often packaged in plastic to preserve it for longer, but this comes at a cost to the environment. Plastic packaging is difficult to decompose, taking over 100 years to fully break down, and during this time it releases harmful chemicals and microplastics into the environment.

Microplastics are tiny particles, smaller than 5mm, that are formed when plastic breaks down. They are released from plastic packaging and can end up in our food and water sources. Research has shown that 90% of animal and vegetable protein samples tested positive for microplastics. These particles can also be absorbed through the skin and inhaled through the air we breathe.

Meat is often packaged in vacuum-sealed plastic bags or foam pads and plastic trays to extend its shelf life. However, there are alternative ways to buy meat more sustainably. Buying meat from a local butcher or farmer's market and bringing your own containers is one way to reduce plastic waste. Some supermarkets, such as Whole Foods, also allow customers to bring their own containers for meat purchases.

Another option is to buy meat in bulk, as this reduces the overall amount of plastic packaging. Canned meat, such as Spam and tuna, is also an option as these come in cans or glass jars. For those who are unable to access fresh meat, frozen meat alternatives like plant-based burgers, which are often highly processed and contain more microplastics, may be a more sustainable option.

Plastic in plant-based proteins

Plastic pollution has become a pressing issue, with plastics pervading all aspects of the food chain. A recent study found that 90% of animal and vegetable protein samples tested positive for microplastics. These tiny polymer fragments, smaller than 5mm, are found in the air, ocean, soil, and even in our food and drinks.

Plant-based proteins are not exempt from this issue. A study by Ocean Conservancy and the University of Toronto found microplastics in 88% of protein food samples, including tofu and three different plant-based meat alternatives. The study also revealed that highly processed protein products, such as tofu and plant-based burgers, contained significantly more microplastics per gram than minimally processed products. This suggests that food processing may be a significant source of microplastics contamination.

The presence of microplastics in plant-based proteins is concerning, as these particles can have harmful effects on human health. Research has shown that microplastics can damage human cells, decrease reproductive health, and disrupt the endocrine system. They can also act as a vessel for toxic chemicals to enter the body, posing additional risks.

While it is challenging to avoid microplastics entirely, some steps can be taken to reduce exposure. Consumers can opt for minimally processed foods, reduce the use of plastic packaging, and support initiatives advocating for reduced plastic production and pollution. Additionally, the development of biodegradable plastics in plants shows potential for environmentally friendly alternatives to synthetic polymers.

Frequently asked questions